Spending Cuts Make Good Offsets Too

The extenders bill the House is considering would cost $190 billion between 2010-2020. Only $56 billion of that would be offset.

Emergency designations and PAYGO loopholes aside, we think more (like all) of the bill should be paid for, a belief that seems hard to argue against when staring at a mountain of $8.5 trillion in debt. (If you want to visualize that mountain, picture $100 bills stacked 5,695 miles high.)

So far the offsets in the House bill include:

  • Taxation of carried interest ($30 billion)
  • Oil spill liability tax ($11 billion)
  • Other revenue increases ($15 billion)

But all the proposed offsets are tax increases. May we suggest that spending cuts make excellent offsets as well.

The CBO offers a good list of potential candidates. Or take a run at our Stabilize the Debt! simulator. We at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget will soon be offering more potential offsets on our blog – stay tuned, or send us ideas of your own.

Post a New Comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <p> <br><img><div><span><object><embed><blockquote> <!--break-->
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Insert a chart by placing [chart:nid] into your content, where nid is the node ID.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.