Process and Rules

Joint Statement on the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform

What CRFB Would Like to See in the FY 2011 Budget

CHAIRMAN
Bill Frenzel
Tim Penny
Charlie Stenholm

 
PRESIDENT
Maya MacGuineas
­­­
 
DIRECTORS
Barry Anderson
Roy Ash
Charles Bowsher
Steve Coll
Dan Crippen
Vic Fazio
Willis Gradison
William Gray, III
William Hoagland
Douglas Holtz-Eakin
Jim Jones
Lou Kerr
Jim Kolbe
James Lynn
James McIntrye, Jr.
David Minge
Jim Nussle
Marne Obernauer, Jr.
June O'Neill
Rudolph Penner
Peter Peterson
Robert Reischauer
Alice Rivlin
Martin Sabo
Gene Steuerle
David Stockman
Paul Volcker
Carol Cox Wait
David M. Walker
Joseph Wright, Jr.
 

SENIOR ADVISORS
Elmer Staats
Robert Strauss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


What CRFB Would Like to See in the FY 2011 Budget
January 28, 2010



On Monday, February 1, President Obama will unveil his FY 2011 budget. Although the President offered a preview of some portions of the budget last night, many questions remain. Given the United States’ mounting debt, the budget must begin the process of closing our fiscal gap. In particular, CRFB hopes that the administration’s FY 2011 budget request:

1) Commits to an ambitious, yet attainable, fiscal goal. Given the nation’s current fiscal picture, U.S. creditors need to be reassured that the country intends to take control of our future debt path; to do this, the country needs an aggressive, yet realistic, fiscal goal. The Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform has recommended stabilizing the debt at 60% of GDP by 2018, but this is by no means the only option. The important thing is that a goal be ambitious enough to avert a fiscal crisis, but realistic enough that it is viewed as credible. It is also important that a fiscal goal capture the need to deal with both the medium- and long-term fiscal imbalances – such as the case with a goal of stabilizing the debt so it does not grow as a share of the economy once the target is hit.

2) Details specific actions for meeting fiscal goals. It isn’t enough to set a fiscal target; the President must also provide specific policy proposals to achieve the goal. The partial discretionary spending freeze President Obama discussed last night is a good start, but stabilizing the debt likely will require changes to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense, and tax policy as well.

3)Avoids using gimmicks. The President’s budget must be able to meet his fiscal targets without relying on any budget gimmicks. For example, assuming that certain policies will expire when they are unlikely to can make it seem easier to stabilize the debt. Relying on unspecified savings (sometimes called “magic asterisks”), such as those suggested by a fiscal commission, also would be problematic – unless some type of “trigger” were put in place to implement tangible policies if an agreement could not be reached.

4) Enforces fiscal targets through budget rules and process reform. To codify his proposed targets, we encourage the President to insist on fiscal rules – such as an exemption-free PAYGO, statutory budget caps, and a debt trigger – to help maintain the fiscal path Congress chooses. Other reforms designed to bring transparency, order, and a focus on the long-term to the budget process also would be helpful.

“This is a critical year for the budget,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “As the White House pivots from focusing on economic recovery to reducing the deficit, it needs to start the discussion by presenting an aggressive and credible budget. But the story doesn’t end there. It is an election year and President Obama will have to use a good deal of his political capital to get Congress to work with him on enacting any of the tough measures he is willing to put forth.”

 


Click here for a pdf version of this release.

For press inquiries, please contact Kate Brown at (202) 596-3365 or brown@newamerica.net.

 

CRFB Supports Creating a Statutory Commission

CHAIRMAN
Bill Frenzel
Tim Penny
Charlie Stenholm

 
PRESIDENT
Maya MacGuineas
­­­
 
DIRECTORS
Barry Anderson
Roy Ash
Charles Bowsher
Steve Coll
Dan Crippen
Vic Fazio
Willis Gradison
William Gray, III
William Hoagland
Douglas Holtz-Eakin
Jim Jones
Lou Kerr
Jim Kolbe
James Lynn
James McIntrye, Jr.
David Minge
Jim Nussle
Marne Obernauer, Jr.
June O'Neill
Rudolph Penner
Peter Peterson
Robert Reischauer
Alice Rivlin
Martin Sabo
Gene Steuerle
David Stockman
Paul Volcker
Carol Cox Wait
David M. Walker
Joseph Wright, Jr.
 

SENIOR ADVISORS
Elmer Staats
Robert Strauss
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


CRFB Supports Creating a Statutory Commission
January 25, 2010
 

The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) supports creating a statutory commission to help deal with the nation’s budgetary challenges.

As part of the discussion on whether to increase the debt ceiling, the Senate is scheduled to vote this week on an amendment offered by Senator Kent Conrad (DND) and Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) to create a task force that would make specific recommendations for how to address the nation’s fiscal imbalances. President Obama endorsed the commission this weekend.

It has long been the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget’s preference that Congress directly addresses these urgent budget challenges, but given the seeming unwillingness to do so under regular order, CRFB thinks a commission would be beneficial.

“A commission is certainly not a cure-all,” said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “Our leaders must still make hard tax and spending choices, and sell them to the American people. But a commission can help to jump-start the critical process of crafting a sensible fiscal plan for the country, and make that process just a little bit easier.”

A budget commission offers a number of potential advantages including:

  • Sending a credible signal to creditors and financial markets that the US is serious about tackling its fiscal challenges 
  • Establishing a shared fiscal goal
  • Creating a bipartisan forum in which to discuss budget issues
  • Establishing a process to ensure that the recommendations are considered
  • Lending political cover

“The country now faces both medium- and long-term budget challenges. A commission will probably need to work toward two goals: stabilizing the debt in the medium term, and then bringing it down to manageable levels over the longer term,” MacGuineas said.

“The most important ingredient for success is that there is bipartisan buy-in. Nothing should be taken off the table in establishing a commission, both to help facilitate broad buy-in and because the problem is so large that all policy options will have to be considered” said MacGuineas.

 

Click here for a pdf version of this release.

For press inquiries, please contact Kate Brown at (202) 596-3365 or brown@newamerica.net.

 

Red Ink Rising

Download this document

In Red Ink Rising: A Call to Action to Stem the Mounting Federal Debt, The Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform calls on policy makers to stabilize the national debt through a six-step plan. Crafted over the past year by former heads of the CBO, OMB, GAO, and the congressional budget committees, the plan reflects a bipartisan approach to avoiding the tremendous global risks of America's expanding debt, without destabilizing the economic recovery. Red Ink Rising is the first of two major reports to be released by the commission.

Op-Ed: Congress' Bad Record of Passing Appropriations Bills Shows Need for Budget Process Reform

The Hill | Dec. 10, 2009

 

In the next few days, the House and Senate will engage in their usual end-of-year dance and vote on two massive omnibus appropriations bills to keep the government funded. The bills will help avoid another series of stopgap Continuing Resolutions that have kept the lights on in much of the federal government since October 1—the start of the new fiscal year. Lawmakers, anxious to leave for the year and smelling the proverbial jet fumes, will consider the omnibus bills “must-pass” since they include seven of the “regular” appropriations bills needed to fund everything from veterans’ benefits to railroad safety.

Once again, the much-vaunted “regular order” has been thrown out the window. But in January, members will return to the Capitol and promise that things will be different. The appropriations bills will be finished on time. But will they? The last time Congress was able to complete all of the appropriations bills individually by the start of the new fiscal year was 1994. Republicans love to blame the Democrats for the mess and Democrats take every opportunity to blame the Republicans. But neither party has managed to find a way to make the trains run on time.

Now, this may all seem like inside baseball, but the impact is serious. Managers of federal programs, already well into developing their next year’s budgets, still do not have their final Fiscal 2010 funding levels. Then there’s the question of whether lawmakers seriously discuss federal priorities when spending programs are lumped into a huge piece of legislation. If Congress cannot not even pass the annual appropriations bills on time, how can we expect it to deal with the unsustainable fiscal path that awaits us over the next decade?

Is there a better way to do things? Can a process be developed that will work even with sharp partisan divides on Capitol Hill? The Peter G. Peterson Foundation, The Pew Charitable Trust and the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget believe that there is a better way and have established The Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform This commission will make recommendations for how best to improve the nation’s fiscal future.

Copyright 2009, The Hill

CRFB Supports Fiscal Task Force

CHAIRMAN
Bill Frenzel
Tim Penny
Charlie Stenholm

 
PRESIDENT
Maya MacGuineas
­­­
 
DIRECTORS
Barry Anderson
Roy Ash
Charles Bowsher
Steve Coll
Dan Crippen
Vic Fazio
Willis Gradison
William Gray, III
William Hoagland
Douglas Holtz-Eakin
Jim Jones
Lou Kerr
Jim Kolbe
James Lynn
James McIntrye, Jr.
David Minge
Jim Nussle
Marne Obernauer, Jr.
June O'Neill
Rudolph Penner
Peter Peterson
Robert Reischauer
Alice Rivlin
Martin Sabo
Gene Steuerle
David Stockman
Paul Volcker
Carol Cox Wait
David M. Walker
Joseph Wright, Jr.
 

SENIOR ADVISORS
Elmer Staats
Robert Strauss
 
 
 
 
 
 



CRFB Supports Fiscal Task Force
December 9, 2009


The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget commends Senators Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Judd Gregg (R-NH) on their proposal - released today - to create a Bipartisan Fiscal Task Force.

With the public debt above 50 percent of GDP and rising steadily, and Americans increasingly frustrated with the inability of Washington to deal with the dire situation, some type of commission, task force, or budget summit would be a sensible approach to break through the partisan deadlock to foster fiscal responsibility.


“A bipartisan commission would greatly help politicians address the nation’s long-term fiscal challenges,” stated Maya MacGuineas, President of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. “Establishing a budget commission could send an important signal to creditors that the U.S. is serious about fixing the budget situation, create a bipartisan forum where lawmakers can hash out the compromises that will be necessary, and lend political cover for making the tough choices ahead.”

Another important benefit of a fiscal commission is that it could create a shared fiscal goal as a focal point for achieving real solutions. The bipartisan Peterson-Pew Commission on Budget Reform, a joint venture of CRFB, the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, and The Pew Charitable Trusts, has been working to develop an appropriate goal for dealing with the growing debt and will release a report, Red Ink Rising: A Call to Action to Stem the Mounting Federal Debt, on December 14 at the National Press Club with a six-step plan.

“Unfortunately, the gridlocked and dysfunctional legislative process has proven unable to deal with the coming fiscal crisis, and time is quickly running out,” said MacGuineas. “Establishing a bipartisan task force that promotes collaboration and honest discourse with an expedited process for considering its recommendations can overcome the polarization and disorder in Washington to effectively fix the budget situation and place the U.S. on a sustainable fiscal path. It is less important to us the specifics of any commission or task force than the reflection that Congress and the White House are finally willing to turn their attention to this pressing problem.”



Click here for a pdf version of this release.

For press inquiries, please contact Kate Brown at (202) 596-3365 or brown@newamerica.net.

 

Where Are Those Appropriations Bills?

CHAIRMAN
Bill Frenzel
Tim Penny
Charlie Stenholm

 
PRESIDENT
Maya MacGuineas
­­­
 
DIRECTORS
Barry Anderson
Roy Ash
Charles Bowsher
Steve Coll
Dan Crippen
Vic Fazio
Willis Gradison
William Gray, III
William Hoagland
Douglas Holtz-Eakin
Jim Jones
Lou Kerr
Jim Kolbe
James Lynn
James McIntrye, Jr.
David Minge
Jim Nussle
Marne Obernauer, Jr.
June O'Neill
Rudolph Penner
Peter Peterson
Robert Reischauer
Alice Rivlin
Martin Sabo
Gene Steuerle
David Stockman
Paul Volcker
Carol Cox Wait
David M. Walker
Joseph Wright, Jr.
 

SENIOR ADVISORS
Elmer Staats
Robert Strauss


Where Are Those Appropriations Bills?
December 7, 2009


More than two months after the start of Fiscal Year 2010, only five of the twelve appropriations bills necessary to continue government functions have been enacted. Congress’s continued poor track record in fulfilling its fundamental obligation to fund the operations of government in an efficient manner exposes the need for budget process reform.


“If we can’t do something as simple as passing the appropriations bills we review every year, how are we supposed to do any of the heavy lifting on the budget?” asked Maya MacGuineas, President of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

Although the House has passed all twelve of its appropriations bills, three have not been passed in the Senate, and another four are still being negotiated in Conference committee.  Since October 1, these government functions have been sustained by stopgap continuing resolutions (CR), the latest of which is set to expire on December 18th.

“With the health care debate set to take up much of the floor time in the Senate, it’s looking likely that Congress will either pass another CR or  again rely on an end-of-year omnibus to wrap up all of its unfinished business just before leaving town,” said MacGuineas. “Budgeting is one of the most basic functions of governing—there really is no excuse for failing to pass these bills.”

“How can federal agencies develop realistic 2011 budgets if they don’t even know what funds they’ll have in 2010? We need to have a serious discussion of how to improve our country’s budget process so that spending bills can receive the attention they deserve.”


Click here for a pdf version of this release.

For press inquiries, please contact Kate Brown at (202) 596-3365 or brown@newamerica.net.

 

Syndicate content