August 2009

Wash Post and FT Call For Medium-Term Deficit Reduction Plan

Recently, both the Washington Post (Bad-News Budget) and the Financial Times (Fiscal Challenges for a Recovering US) have written excellent editorials recommending that the U.S. adopt a medium term consolidation (deficit reduction) plan. We have been calling for something similar in recent months and continue to believe in the importance of announcing a Fiscal Recovery Plan.

While it would be premature to withdraw economic stimulus by reducing near-term budget deficits, announcing a credible medium-term plan to be phased in once the economic is strong enough would reassure our creditors as well as financial markets that we are not headed towards a fiscal crisis. Similar announcements have worked in many countries when they faced their own debt challenges.
 
Ideally, the White House would work with Congress to achieve a plan over the next few months. One possibility is that they use next year's budget submission in February as the opportunity to unveil such a plan, though it will have to have bipartisan support to be credible, and thus working with a bipartisan group of lawmakers now to develop the plan would make it more likely to succeed.
 
The sooner we get started on this, the better.

 

So What Will the Deficit Really Be?

Last week, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its updated Budget and Economic Outlook and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released its Mid-Session Review (see our analysis here). Popular press accounts have reported CBO's ten year deficit projections at $7.1 trillion and OMB's at $9.1 trillion. However, it is important to note that these numbers are measuring two different things....

CBO's $7.1 trillion deficit estimate comes from their "current law" baseline (referred to as the BEA baseline) which assumes laws play out as they are on the books. OMB's $9.1 trillion projection is a deficit estimate assuming the passage of all the policies in President Obama's proposed budget. The numbers differ both because they are measuring different things, and because they are relying on different economic and technical assumptions.

In our recent analysis, CRFB has drawn a bridge between these two numbers, using OMB's estimate of the BEA baseline and OMB's estimate of its own "current policy" baseline* as intermediaries. Below, we offer some further explanation of the differences between each of these four measurements of future deficits.

As the chart above shows, CBO's baseline is quite similar to OMB's estimate of the BEA baseline over the next five years. The deficit impact of CBO's decision to treat Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as government entities is roughly offset by differences in economic and technical assumptions. Between 2015 and 2019, however, CBO expects significantly lower levels of economic growth (2.4% versus 3% annually) resulting in less revenue collection. Because of this and other assumptions, OMB's BEA baseline projects ten year deficit levels roughly $875 billion lower than CBO's baseline

  2009 2010-2014 2010-2019
CBO Baseline $1587 $3988 $7137
  Treatment of Fannie/Freddie -$178 -$31 -$47
  Economic/Technical Assumptions +$140 +$125 -$830
OMB BEA Baseline $1549
$4081
$6259

Once calculating the BEA baseline, OMB uses it to construct its own "current policy" baseline. Rather than making projections based upon the policies scheduled under current law, this baseline assumes that politicians will enact legislation to continue certain policies. In particular, they assume all of the 2001 tax cuts will be renewed, the AMT will be patches every year, and scheduled physician payment cuts in Medicare will be averted. Taken as a whole, these policies cost around $4.3 trillion over the next decade.

  2010-2014 2010-2019
OMB BEA Baseline $4081
$6259
  Extend 2001/2003 Tax Cuts +$928 +$2682
  Index AMT Patches +$192 +$546
  Maintain Medicare Physician Payments +$137 +$311
  Other Adjustments +$17 +$78
  Additional Interest +$100 +$679
OMB Current Policy Baseline $5454 $10555

 From this baseline, the OMB adds in the effects of the President's policy proposals. Health care reform, at least in the President's budget, is projected to be revenue neutral. However, the Administration does expect new tax cuts and increased discretionary spending. At the same time, they project considerable deficit reduction, compared to their current policy baseline, mainly from ending the war in Iraq, allowing the 2001/2003 tax cuts to expire for those making over $250,000 a year, and auctioning carbon permits under a cap and trade system. Taken on the whole, the Administration's policies  are projected to reduce the deficit by $1.5 trillion over the next ten years, relative to their current policy baseline. Relative to a current law baseline, though, their policies would increase the deficit by roughly $2.8 trillion.

  2010-2014 2010-2019
OMB Current Policy Baseline $5454 $10555
  Cap-and-Trade Revenue -$232 -$627
  Tax Cuts +$333 +$827
  Ending Iraq War -$370 -$944
  Increased Discretionary Spending +$92 +$340
  Expiration of Upper-Income Tax Cuts -$178 -$580
  Other Policies -$101 -$272
  Interest -$24 -$248
President's Budget $4974
$9051

So how big will the deficit be over the next ten years? $7.1 trillion, $6.3 trillion, $10.6 trillion, or $9.1 trillion?

Almost certainly, the answer is none of the above. For one, both CBO's and OMB's economic projections come with a considerable amount of uncertainty, especially in the later years. And the size and composition of the economy will dramatically effect the amount of revenue we will raise and spending we will have committed.

In addition, there is considerable uncertainty as to what policies will be enacted. It is highly unlikely that we will simply allow current law to play out, but also implausible that we will adopt and maintain all of the President's policies.

Whatever the situation, though, recent projections suggest a dire fiscal situation over the next decade. To prevent it, we need a fiscal consolidation plan.

AttachmentSize
Deficit_Projections.JPG23.27 KB

NewsHour Budget Segment

MacGuineas, Guha, and Wessel on the NEWSHOUR, on the reappointment of Bernanke and the new budget numbers.

Put Another $2 Trillion on the Tab

CRFB released this report on OMB's Mid-Session Review. (We will soon release a more detailed analysis.) CBO provides a comparison chart between OMB and the new CBO baselines - not to be confused the OMB projections which assume the president's budget is adopted and are much worse than either baseline.  Busy day for budgeting.

OMB's Mid-Session Review Will Show Greater Ten-Year Deficits

Late Friday the White House conceded that ten-year deficits would total around $9 trillion, according to their estimates. This is $2 trillion greater than the ten-year deficit number predicted in their May FY 2010 budget, which they stated to be $7.1 trillion. This puts the White House more closely in line with Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predictions, which put ten-year deficits at $9.1 trillion.

 
The change in these numbers can be partly attributed to updated projections on economic growth. The White House predicted before that the economy would shrink by 1.2 percent in May, when in fact it shrank by 6.4 percent in the first quarter.
 
The Mid-Session Review, which will include details of these updates, will be formally released tomorrow. The CBO is expected to release its updated Budget and Economic Outlook as well.

Bernanke at Jackson Hole

The Fed is holding its annual summer retreat at Jackson Hole, Wyoming, which features Fed officials and outside experts discussing the critical issues of the day. Kicking off the event, Chairman Ben Bernanke offered a sobering review of the past year ("Reflections on a Year of Crisis"). Bernanke noted that at the same symposium a year earlier, market participants didn't anticipate the crisis that would start to unfold only a month later, although the economic and financial situation was hardly normal in August 2008.
 
Shortly after Jackson Hole 2008, the crisis unfolded: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were put into conservatorship and the Treasury Department would provide massive support; Lehman Brothers failed and many prominent firms struggled to survive in the aftermath of the Lehman failure (Merrill Lynch was acquired by Bank of America; Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs were stabilized when the Fed approved their applications to become bank holding companies); AIG nearly failed and considerable resources were supplied to shore it up. The crisis has been global, as has been the policy response. 
 
He commented that the outcome could have been much worse in the absence of the aggressive monetary, fiscal and financial policies that were taken around the world, in contrast to the 1930s.
 
With financial regulatory reform still pending, Chairman Bernanke discussed why we need a systemic financial regulator and why it should be the Fed (the proposal for the Fed has been extremely controversial). Noting the role of liquidity in systemic crises, he stated that strengthening liquidity risk management at firm level would not be sufficient to prevent a systemic crisis, although it was important; and that only central banks were positioned to step in and provide liquidity.

 

 

 

Fiscal Space, Stimulus and Entitlement Cuts

Given the weak economy, how do we balance our need for economic stimulus now with our need to get our fiscal house in order to prevent the age and health-related tsunami? Can we address both our short-term and long-term problems at the same time? 

In a recent article, the IMF's chief economist Olivier Blanchard offers some relevant food for thought.
 
According to Dr. Blanchard, a cut in the future growth rate of entitlement programs can substantially increase the "fiscal space" for continuing stimulus, if done at the same time. (The stimulus will of course have to be phased out eventually.) While the U.S. was not singled out, this may be important advice for us to keep in mind as we prepare our Fiscal Recovery Plan. (See CRFB's call for a Fiscal Recovery Plan.)

 

Mid-Session Review to Report Lower 2009 Deficit

August 20 - Next Tuesday the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will release their Mid-Session Review of the budget. They plan to announce that the federal deficit this year will total $1.58 trillion, three times more than the FY 2008 deficit, but about $260 billion less than they predicted in their FY 2010 budget released in May. The shortfall was previously thought to come out at $1.84 trillion.

Most of this difference is due to the Administration providing around $250 billion less in aid to Wall Street than they had previously accounted for in their budget. Obama had initially factored in this $250 billion "placeholder" to spend on an additional bailout of troubled banks, but ended up not asking Congress for the money so as to avoid criticism for excessive spending. Additionally, spending at the FDIC is expected to be $78 billion less than originally forecast.
 
The nation's debt is currently $11.7 trillion, with another $1.26 trillion deficit predicted for next year by the OMB.
 
The Congressional Budget Office is expected to come out with their updated budget outlook on the same day as the Mid-Session Review is released. Look here next week for an analysis by CRFB.  

 

Buffett Warns Against Rising Debt-to-GDP Ratio

Warren Buffett has written in the New York Times that significant levels of U.S. spending will prove to pose problems for our economy and currency down the road. Noting that the Federal Reserve and key economic officials responded to the financial crisis in a way that avoided total meltdown and put the economy on the slow path to recovery, he added that the spending administered during this crisis (as well as continued spending) will have serious side effects that Congress and government officials must address.

 

Buffett points out that our country's level of net debt to G.D.P. is "mushrooming," which, among other effects, could cause us to lose our global reputation for financial integrity. He sums up his argument by saying:

With government expenditures now running 185 percent of receipts, truly major changes in both taxes and outlays will be required. A revived economy can't come close to bridging that sort of gap.... Our immediate problem is to get our country back on its feet and flourishing - "whatever it takes" still makes sense. Once recovery is gained, however, Congress must end the rise in the debt-to-G.D.P. ratio and keep our growth in obligations in line with our growth in resources.

Record Monthly and Yearly U.S. Deficit

August 18 - According to Bloomberg, last month's budget deficit hit a record $180.7 billion, higher than any month in U.S. history.

Spending in July rose to $332.2 billion, up 26 percent from a year earlier, whereas revenue fell 6 percent to $151.5 billion. The deficit now stands at $1.27 trillion so far this year.
 
For the entire fiscal year, budget experts are predicting a deficit of around $1.6 trillion by the year's end. Although this is somewhat less than previous Administration and Congressional Budget Office FY 2009 deficit forecasts (mainly because the Obama administration never requested an anticipated $250 billion for additional financial bailouts), it will still be far higher than deficits at any other time in history.
 
Although immediate deficit reduction could destabilize the economic recovery, CRFB  has urged the Administration and Congress to act swiftly to develop and pass a medium- and long-term fiscal consolidation plan to bring down deficits once the economy has recovered.

 

Unwanted Defense Spending Draws Presidential Veto Threat

President Obama reiterated his intention to veto any Defense Appropriations Bill that contains superfluous spending provisions today at a Veterans of Foreign Wars convention. $485 million for new presidential helicopters from Lockheed Martin, $560 million for F-35 backup engines, and $369 million for the controversial F-22 fighters are among the items that would draw a Presidential veto.  

According to Obama, “The entrenched lobbyists [are] pushing weapons that even our military says it doesn't want. This waste would be unacceptable at any time. But at a time when we're fighting two wars and facing a serious deficit, it's inexcusable.”
 
The House of Representatives has already passed its defense appropriations bill, which included funding for the F-35 engines and Presidential helicopters, but not the F-22s. After the Senate votes on its edition of the bill, it will be up to a conference committee to iron out any differences between the two versions.
 
We encourage President Obama to continue fighting against wasteful government spending, which serves only to drive the country further into debt and places the United States on an unsustainable path. $1.4 billion worth of defense savings is a welcomed first step, but this does not go far enough in light of an impending trillion dollar deficit. CRFB urges the President to cut even more wasteful government spending and to work with both Democrats and Republicans at establishing fiscally responsible public policies.

Obama Economic Advisor Appears on The Daily Show

Austan Goolsbee, chief economist of President Obama's Economic Recovery Advisory Board appears below on the Daily Show with John Stewart. Goolsbee discusses, among other things, the looming deficit, and health care reform.